Christopher Pratt (cpratt) wrote,
Christopher Pratt

Fun with Wikipedia

After noticing that whiskerfish added himself to Wikipedia's article on notable LJ users, presumably after reading thornyc's most recent post, I thought about reverting his edit... but I didn't.

Instead of reverting his edit, I re-edited the article to insert his entry into the correct alphabetically ordered place on the page.

Dear readers: What's the correct etiquette in this situation? Revert the edit? Politely remind Fish that Wikipedia is not a valid avenue of self-promotion, but rather an encyclopedia? Ignore it? Demand proof that Fish is indeed a "notable" poet?

More importantly, why should I even care about this stuff?

  • It's July 2013.

    Remember when I wrote a lot on LiveJournal? Yeah, me neither.

  • Steve

    I'm not surprised by Jobs' death, and of course my inner cynic wants to blame homeopathy or whatever the hell it was he was into; an anecdote that…

  • Wein Keller

    It took ten days to clear Canadian customs and make it to San Diego, but Dan just installed the replacement thermostat for our crappy wine cabinet…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded